From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bronson v. Overton

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 17, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-52E (W.D. Pa. Jun. 17, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-52E.

June 17, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2010, after the Plaintiff, Purcell Bronson, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis was filed by Plaintiff, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties until June 14, 2010, to file written objections thereto, and Plaintiff having filed a Motion for Case Management Conference instead of objections to the Report and Recommendation, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order granting Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is VACATED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is given until July 17, 2010, in which to pay the filing fee and if he fails to do so, the Court will enter an order dismissing the action for failure to prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Case Management Conference [90] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Bronson v. Overton

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 17, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-52E (W.D. Pa. Jun. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Bronson v. Overton

Case Details

Full title:PURCELL BRONSON, Plaintiff v. MAXINE OVERTON; DOCTOR BAKER; RAYMOND…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 17, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-52E (W.D. Pa. Jun. 17, 2010)