In Jackson v. Bronson (19 John. 325), the mortgagor sustained ejectment against the grantee of the mortgagee, the Court holding the assignment of the interest of the mortgagee in the land, without an assignment of the debt, a nullity.
Summary of this case from Nagle v. MacyNo. 18–9112.
06-24-2019
Daniel BRONSON, petitioner, v. Wanza JACKSON–MITCHELL, Warden.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
In Jackson v. Bronson (19 John. 325), the mortgagor sustained ejectment against the grantee of the mortgagee, the Court holding the assignment of the interest of the mortgagee in the land, without an assignment of the debt, a nullity.
Summary of this case from Nagle v. MacyFull title:Daniel BRONSON, petitioner, v. Wanza JACKSON–MITCHELL, Warden.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: Jun 24, 2019
An assignment of the mortgage without the debt is a nullity. ( Jackson v. Willard, 4 John. 41; Jackson v.…
Nagle v. MacyAs distinct from the debt, the mortgage has no determinate value, and is not a subject of transfer. In…