Bronson v. Close

Full title: PURCELL BRONSON, Petitioner, v. DAVID J. CLOSE, WARDEN, S.C.I. HOUTZDALE…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 25, 2011

Case No. 3:10-cv-143-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-cv-143-KRG-KAP.

March 25, 2011

MEMORANDUM ORDER

KIM GIBSON, District Judge

The petitioner's motion for reconsideration, docket no. 6, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on March 2, 2011, docket no. 7, recommending that the motion be denied. The parties were notified pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), that they had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No one has filed objections and the time to do so has expired.

Upon review of the record of this matter, the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 25^th day of March, 2011, it is

ORDERED that petitioner's motion for reconsideration, docket no. 6, is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court.