From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bronsdon v. Shupe

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 449 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided February 1st, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 98 N.J. Eq. 67.

Mr. Lichtenstein Lichtenstein, for the respondent.

Mr. Harry Augenblick, for the appellant.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Bronsdon v. Shupe

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 449 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Bronsdon v. Shupe

Case Details

Full title:W. HOWARD BRONSDON, respondent, v. WILLIAM F. SHUPE, appellant

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 449 (N.J. 1926)

Citing Cases

Steinberg v. Kasdin

"The equitable right of complainant is to have defendants transfer to him certain shares of stock which…

Specht v. Eastwood-Nealley Corp.

Not all bonds so abundantly secured and yielding such an interest rate are as attractive and available to the…