From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bromsted v. Hamilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1913
155 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Opinion

March, 1913.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground that a presumption of payment arises from the various transactions after the plaintiff's claim accrued. The plaintiff made no such claim when called upon to pay defendant's judgment nor at any time until long after the death of defendant's testator, and in any event the fifty dollars rent should have been allowed.


Summaries of

Bromsted v. Hamilton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 1, 1913
155 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for

Bromsted v. Hamilton

Case Details

Full title:John H. Bromsted, Respondent, v. Albert L. Hamilton, as Administrator with…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1913

Citations

155 App. Div. 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)