From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bromfield v. McBurney

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 12, 2009
CASE NO. C07-5226RBL-KLS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 12, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. C07-5226RBL-KLS.

March 12, 2009


ORDER


The Court, having reviewed defendant's supplemental motion to dismiss/motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #57), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) Antolin Andrew Marks' filing of objections purportedly on behalf of plaintiff were not considered and will be STRICKEN [Dkt. #60]. Marks' Motion to File Amicus Brief [Dkt. #61] is DENIED.
(2) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;
(3) Defendant's motion is GRANTED;
(4) Plaintiff's complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice;
(5) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, defendant's counsel and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom.


Summaries of

Bromfield v. McBurney

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 12, 2009
CASE NO. C07-5226RBL-KLS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Bromfield v. McBurney

Case Details

Full title:DAMION BROMFIELD, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES McBURNEY, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Mar 12, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. C07-5226RBL-KLS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Simpson Performance Prods., Inc. v. NecksGen, Inc.

Thus, "Rule 12(g) operates in conjunction with Rule 12(h) to require that all defenses permitted to be raised…

Simpson Performance Prods., Inc. v. MasterCraft Safety, Inc.

Thus, "Rule 12(g) operates in conjunction with Rule 12(h) to require that all defenses permitted to be raised…