From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BROE v. WARDEN

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton
Oct 17, 2006
Case No. 1:05-cv-025 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 17, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:05-cv-025.

October 17, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #8), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired on October 10, 2006, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations, dismissing Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus matter with prejudice.

The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

BROE v. WARDEN

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton
Oct 17, 2006
Case No. 1:05-cv-025 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 17, 2006)
Case details for

BROE v. WARDEN

Case Details

Full title:JOHN BROE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, LEBANON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton

Date published: Oct 17, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:05-cv-025 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 17, 2006)

Citing Cases

United States v. Kucera

I get a lawyer at this time? . . . I think I should get one,” not unequivocal invocation of right to…

Steele v. Tambi

However, where it is clear that "a petitioner's claims in federal habeas rest on different theories than…