From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brodzki v. Westerman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 25, 2011
2:11-CV-00697-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Aug. 25, 2011)

Opinion

2:11-CV-00697-PMP-GWF

08-25-2011

ANTHONY BRODZKI, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE WESTERMAN, Defendant.


ORDER

Before the Court for consideration is Plaintiff Anthony Brodzki's Complaint and Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #1), filed on May 2, 2011. On August 4, 2011, the Honorable George Foley, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, entered a Report of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #2) recommending that Plaintiff Brodzki's Complaint (Doc. #1) should be denied.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that Magistrate Judge Foley's Report of Findings and Recommendation should be Affirmed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Foley's Report of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #2) are Affirmed and Plaintiff Anthony Brodzki's Complaint (Doc. #1) is DISMISSED with prejudice.

PHILIP M. PRO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brodzki v. Westerman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 25, 2011
2:11-CV-00697-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Aug. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Brodzki v. Westerman

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BRODZKI, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE WESTERMAN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 25, 2011

Citations

2:11-CV-00697-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Aug. 25, 2011)

Citing Cases

Brodzki v. Cook Cnty.

The Court also notes that Plaintiff has filed seventeen lawsuits before the District of Nevada since July…