From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brodzki v. Shannon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 30, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 5:11-CV-1117 (GTS/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 5:11-CV-1117 (GTS/ATB) CASE NUMBER: 5:11-CV-1118 (GTS/ATB)

01-30-2012

ANTHONY BRODZKI Plaintiff v. JOE SHANNON, JR., District Attorney of Tarrant County, Texas; and TARRANT COUNTY Defendant(s) ANTHONY BRODZKI Plaintiff v. PHIL KOSS, District Attorney of Walworth County, Wisconsin; and DAVE ROGERS, District Attorney of Clark County, Nevada Defendant(s)


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

That the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 USC section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii). The Court certifies, for the purposes of 28 USC section 1915(a)(3), that any appeal of the Decision & Order in this matter would not be taken in good faith.

All of the above pursuant to the order of the Honorable Judge Glenn T. Suddaby, dated the 27th day of January, 2012.

______________________

Clerk of Court

______________________

Joanne Bleskoski

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Brodzki v. Shannon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 30, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 5:11-CV-1117 (GTS/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Brodzki v. Shannon

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BRODZKI Plaintiff v. JOE SHANNON, JR., District Attorney of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 30, 2012

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 5:11-CV-1117 (GTS/ATB) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2012)