From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BRODHEIM v. VEAL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 30, 2010
No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P.

July 30, 2010


ORDER


The stay in this matter having been lifted, by Order, filed on July 26, 2010, the parties are herein directed to file concurrent supplemental briefing, within twenty-one days, regarding the effect of the en banc decision in Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010) on this case. Each party's supplemental briefing is not to exceed ten pages. At the expiration of the time for filing supplemental briefing, this matter will be deemed submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

BRODHEIM v. VEAL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 30, 2010
No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2010)
Case details for

BRODHEIM v. VEAL

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM, Petitioner, v. M. VEAL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 30, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2010)