From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BRODHEIM v. VEAL

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 25, 2011
No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 25, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P.

May 25, 2011


ORDER


In response the court's order, filed on March 18, 2011, directing petitioner and respondent to file a joint status report detailing the claims remaining to be decided after remand, the parties filed a joint status report on April 8, 2011, stating that since petitioner/appellee still has motions pending before the Ninth Circuit which have yet to be ruled on and no mandate has yet issued, this court lacks jurisdiction. Accordingly, the undersigned will not require a joint status report regarding claims that remain to be decided and the process necessary to decide them until such time as a mandate from the Ninth Circuit may issue.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 24, 2011


Summaries of

BRODHEIM v. VEAL

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 25, 2011
No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 25, 2011)
Case details for

BRODHEIM v. VEAL

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM, Petitioner, v. M. VEAL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 25, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2326 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 25, 2011)