From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brodheim v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2012
No. Civ. S 06-2326 LKK GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. Civ. S 06-2326 LKK GGH

01-03-2012

MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN DICKINSON, et al., Respondents.

DANIEL J. BRODERICK Federal Defender DAVID M. PORTER Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Petitioner MICHAEL BRODHEIM


DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Federal Defender

DAVID M. PORTER

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Petitioner

MICHAEL BRODHEIM

ORDER


Judge: Honorable Gregory G. Hollows


ORDER

Having reviewed petitioner's unopposed request, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court GRANTS the request and orders:

1. Petitioner shall file any opposition to the motion to dismiss and any cross-motion for an evidentiary hearing on or before January 28, 2012;

2. Respondent's reply to the opposition and to any cross-motion should be filed within thirty days of the filing of petitioner's response;

3. Any reply by petitioner to an opposition to any cross-motion must be filed within thirty days after the filing of such an opposition.

4. The hearing currently set for February 2, 2012, is reset to

Thursday, April 5, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Brodheim v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2012
No. Civ. S 06-2326 LKK GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Brodheim v. Dickinson

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. BRODHEIM, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN DICKINSON, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 3, 2012

Citations

No. Civ. S 06-2326 LKK GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2012)