From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broderick v. News Syndicate Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1924
211 App. Div. 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)

Opinion

November, 1924.

Present — Kelly, P.J., Jaycox, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ.


Judgment and order denying new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs. As we interpret the decision in Bishop v. New York Times Co. ( 233 N.Y. 446), it holds that testimony in a libel suit in enhancement of damages, to the effect that relatives of plaintiff were shunned and ostracised by their friends, with a resultant reaction of mental distress to the plaintiff, is incompetent. We are of opinion that the record before us does not contain testimony, to which exception was taken, falling within the ruling made in the case cited.


Summaries of

Broderick v. News Syndicate Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1924
211 App. Div. 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)
Case details for

Broderick v. News Syndicate Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE BRODERICK, by CELESTINE BRODERICK, Her Guardian and Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1924

Citations

211 App. Div. 812 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)