From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broderick v. Keisler

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 10, 2007
250 F. App'x 793 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-55918.

Submitted October 1, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed October 10, 2007.

Margaret Elizabeth Broderick, Fort Worth, TX, pro se.

U.S. Attorney, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Florence Marie Cooper, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-07-02206-FMC.

Before: B. FLETCHER, BERZON and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Upon review of the record and appellant's opening brief, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court's order denying appellant's motion for preliminary injunctive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record); see also Gregorio T. v. Wilson, 59 F.3d 1002, 1004-05 (9th Cir. 1995) (denial of preliminary injunctive relief reviewed for abuse of discretion).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Broderick v. Keisler

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 10, 2007
250 F. App'x 793 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Broderick v. Keisler

Case Details

Full title:Margaret Elizabeth BRODERICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter D. KEISLER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 10, 2007

Citations

250 F. App'x 793 (9th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Broderick v. Mukasey

Margaret Elizabeth BRODERICK, petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General.Case below, Broderick v.…