In addition, the rents on all cotton sold by the tenant prior to the 16 bales in question, and deposited to Woodson's credit in the bank had been accepted by him without objection to this method of disposing of the crop. See Brod v. Luce (Tex.Civ.App.) 225 S.W. 553, and Melasky v. Jarrell, supra. Under these facts and circumstances we think Price's conduct and agreement, under the broad discretionary power admittedly vested in him by Woodson, would be binding on Woodson as to his power and authority to permit Westbrook to sell the cotton in the open market.