Opinion
Civil Action No. 9:05-2217-CMC-GCK.
May 10, 2006
OPINION and ORDER
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming he was denied appropriate medical care by Defendants when he was incarcerated at the Florence County Detention Center. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff was advised by court order of the procedures and the importance of filing a response to the motion. Plaintiff filed his opposition and Defendants filed a reply. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 (B)(2)(d), DSC, this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge George C. Kosko for pre-trial proceedings and a Report and Recommendation.
The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with the court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of any portion of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to which a specific objection is made. The court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation made by the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The court reviews the Report and Recommendation only for clear error in the absence of an objection. See Diamond v. Colonial Life Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (stating that "in the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.") (citation omitted).
On April 3, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted. The Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff of the procedures and requirements for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation and the serious consequences if he failed to do so. Plaintiff has filed no objections and the time for doing so has expired.
After reviewing the Complaint, the motion, the objections and the reply, and the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and incorporated by reference.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted and this case is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.