From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brock v. Wells Fargo & Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 10, 2024
5:21-cv-00532-JGB-SHK (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2024)

Opinion

5:21-cv-00532-JGB-SHK

01-10-2024

ISALLIAH BROCK, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

HONORABLE JESUS G. BERNAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Isalliah Brock and Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company filed cross-motions for judgment in this Employee Retirement Income Security Action (“ERISA”) action involving a claim for death benefits under an ERISA-governed plan. The Court found the matter appropriate for resolution without a hearing.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

For the reasons set forth in the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law dated November 29, 2023 (Docket 54), the Court affirmed Defendant's decision to deny Plaintiff's claim for plan benefits. Judgment is hereby granted in favor of Defendant.


Summaries of

Brock v. Wells Fargo & Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 10, 2024
5:21-cv-00532-JGB-SHK (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Brock v. Wells Fargo & Co.

Case Details

Full title:ISALLIAH BROCK, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, and METROPOLITAN LIFE…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 10, 2024

Citations

5:21-cv-00532-JGB-SHK (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2024)