From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brock v. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 29, 2021
Civil No. 2:21-CV-10585 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 29, 2021)

Opinion

Civil No. 2:21-CV-10585

06-29-2021

COREY WILFORD BROCK, Plaintiff, v. THOMPSON, Defendant


OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THE MOTION TO ADD DEFENDANTS AND TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT (ECF No. 18)

On May 19, 2021, the Court summarily denied Plaintiff's civil rights complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Plaintiff filed two Notices of Appeal (ECF No. 15, 21). He also filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 17) and a Motion to Add Defendants and to Amend the Complaint. (ECF No. 18).

For the reasons that follow, the Motion is DENIED.

Because Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the Motion to Amend the Complaint; a notice of appeal generally "confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal." Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373, 379 (1985)(citing Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982)(per curiam)); See also Workman v. Tate, 958 F. 2d 164, 167 (6th Cir. 1992). See Hester v. Morgan, 52 F. App'x 220, 225 (6th Cir. 2002).

The Motion to Add Defendants and to Amend the Complaint (ECF No. 18) is DENIED.

s/ Victoria A. Roberts

HON. VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

United States District Judge DATED: 6/29/2021


Summaries of

Brock v. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 29, 2021
Civil No. 2:21-CV-10585 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Brock v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:COREY WILFORD BROCK, Plaintiff, v. THOMPSON, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

Citations

Civil No. 2:21-CV-10585 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 29, 2021)