From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brock v. Terry

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Aug 17, 2009
NO. 2:08-CV-0080 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 17, 2009)

Opinion

NO. 2:08-CV-0080.

August 17, 2009


ORDER


Pending before the court are Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Docket Nos. 17 and 20).

The Court has reviewed Defendant's motions and supporting documents pursuant to Stough v. Mayville Community Schools, 138 F. 3d 612, 614 (6th Cir. 1998), and finds that Defendants have carried their burdens to show that there are no disputed issues of material fact and Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Plaintiffs were given Response deadlines to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment of July 8, 2009 and July 16, 2009, respectively. As of August 17, 2009, no responses have been filed. Failure to respond to a moving party's statement of material facts within the time period provided shall indicate the asserted facts are not disputed for the purposes of summary judgment. L. Rule 56.01(g).

Failure to file a timely response shall indicate that there is no opposition to the motions. L. Rule 7.01B.

Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED and the case is dismissed with prejudice. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brock v. Terry

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Aug 17, 2009
NO. 2:08-CV-0080 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 17, 2009)
Case details for

Brock v. Terry

Case Details

Full title:TRACEY BROCK, Plaintiff, v. TIM TERRY (in his individual capacity) and…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Aug 17, 2009

Citations

NO. 2:08-CV-0080 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 17, 2009)