From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brock v. CVS Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 8, 2022
22 CV 4014 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2022)

Opinion

22 CV 4014 (VB)

06-08-2022

TERRELL K. BROCK, Plaintiff, v. CVS CORPORATION; MANAGER LEO; CITY OF WHITE PLAINS; and JOHN DOE WP PD OFFICERS, Defendants.


ORDER

Vincent L. Briccetti, United States District Judge

Plaintiff, who is incarcerated and proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, moves for appointment of counsel. (Doc. #10).

The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal.

The Court has considered the type and complexity of this case, the merits of plaintiff s claims, and plaintiffs ability to present the case. The Court, in its discretion, does not find exceptional circumstances in plaintiffs case warranting the appointment of counsel at this time. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co, , 877 F.2d 170, 172 (2d Cir. 1989). Accordingly, plaintiffs request is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for renewal at an appropriate time in the future.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Brock v. CVS Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 8, 2022
22 CV 4014 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Brock v. CVS Corp.

Case Details

Full title:TERRELL K. BROCK, Plaintiff, v. CVS CORPORATION; MANAGER LEO; CITY OF…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 8, 2022

Citations

22 CV 4014 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2022)