Opinion
Case No. 10-cv-03428LHK.
November 29, 2011.
FABIO MARINO, DENISE MINGRONE, SIDDHARTHA VENKATESAN, CHRISTINA VON DER AHE, NITIN GAMBHIR, ORRICK, HERRINGTON SUTCLIFFE LLP, Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC
[PROPOSED ] ORDER GRANTING BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.'S AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION AND MOTION TO STRIKE A10 NETWORKS INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL INTERROGATORY RESPONSES
The Court, having considered Brocade Communications, Inc.' and Foundry Networks LLC' ("Plaintiffs") Administrative Motion for Leave to file under seal their Exhibits attached to the Declaration of Denise E. Mingrone In Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition and Motion to Strike A10 Networks Inc.' Motion to Compel Interrogatory Responses, and having found good cause to do so, it is HEREBY ORDERED that said leave is GRANTED in its entirety.
The Plaintiffs may file under seal the following documents:
1. Exhibits C, D, E, G, and H, attached to the Declaration of Denise E. Mingrone In Support of Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. and Foundry Networks, LLC' Opposition and Motion to Strike A10 Networks Inc.' Motion to Compel Interrogatory Responses. Specifically, these Exhibits are:
a. Ex. C: 2011.05.31 [Brocade] Plaintiffs' Identification of Trade Secrets
b. Ex. D: 2011.06.27 [Brocade] Plaintiffs' Supplemental Identification of 20 Categories of Trade Secrets
c. Ex. E: 2011.09.16 [Brocade] Second Supplemental Identification of Trade Secrets
d. Ex. G: 2011.04.08 [Brocade] Supplemental Responses to A10's First Set of Interrogatories
e. Ex. H: 2011.09.16 [Brocade] Supplemental Responses to A10's First and Second Set of Interrogatories