From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brocade Commc'n Sys. Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 29, 2011
Case No. 10-cv-03428 LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 10-cv-03428 LHK

11-29-2011

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, v. A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual; RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and STEVEN HWANG, an individual, Defendants and Counterclaimants.

FABIO MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825) DENISE MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224) SIDDHARTHA VENKATESAN (STATE BAR NO. 245008) CHRISTINA VON DER AHE (STATE BAR NO. 255467) NITIN GAMBHIR (STATE BAR NO. 259906) ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC WILLIAME. IRELAND(STATEBARNO. 115600) H. ANN LIROFF (STATEBARNO. 113180) HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEELLLP Attorneys for Defendant DAVID CHEUNG SCOTT R. MOSKO (STATE BAR NO. 106070) SCOTT A. HERBST (STATE BAR NO. 226739) FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. SMITH R. BRITTINGHAM IV ( Admitted pro hac vice ) JOHN F. HORNICK ( Admitted pro hac vice ) FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. LIONEL M. LAVENUE ( Admitted pro hac vice ) JOHN M. MULCAHY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P. Attorneys for Defendants A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN, RAJKUMAR JALAN, RON SZETO, and STEVE HWANG JOSEPH ERLICH (STATE BAR NO. 84359) LOSCH & EHRLICH Attorneys for Defendant LIANG HAN ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP FABIO E. MARINO Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP ANN H. LIROFF Attorneys for Defendant DAVID CHEUNG FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP SCOTT R. MOSKO Attorneys for Defendants A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN, RAJKUMAR JALAN, RON SZETO, AND STEVE HWANG LOSCH & EHRLICH JOSEPH EHRLICH Attorneys for Defendant LIANG HAN


[PROPOSED] STIPULATION TO

MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDER

FABIO MARINO (STATE BAR NO. 183825)

DENISE MINGRONE (STATE BAR NO. 135224)

SIDDHARTHA VENKATESAN (STATE BAR NO. 245008)

CHRISTINA VON DER AHE (STATE BAR NO. 255467)

NITIN GAMBHIR (STATE BAR NO. 259906)

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.

AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

WILLIAME. IRELAND(STATEBARNO. 115600)

H. ANN LIROFF (STATEBARNO. 113180)

HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEELLLP

Attorneys for Defendant

DAVID CHEUNG

SCOTT R. MOSKO (STATE BAR NO. 106070)

SCOTT A. HERBST (STATE BAR NO. 226739)

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.

SMITH R. BRITTINGHAM IV (Admitted pro hac vice)

JOHN F. HORNICK (Admitted pro hac vice)

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.

LIONEL M. LAVENUE (Admitted pro hac vice)

JOHN M. MULCAHY

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.

Attorneys for Defendants

A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN, RAJKUMAR JALAN,

RON SZETO, and STEVE HWANG

JOSEPH ERLICH (STATE BAR NO. 84359)

LOSCH & EHRLICH

Attorneys for Defendant

LIANG HAN

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among Plaintiffs Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. ("Brocade") and Foundry Networks, LLC ("Foundry") and Defendants A10 Networks, Inc., Lee Chen, Rajkumar Jalan, Ron Szeto, David Cheung, and Liang Han (collectively, "the parties"):

(1) To expedite discovery, the source code previously deposited at Iron Mountain by the parties shall be transferred to the offices of the Parties' Counsel until this case is resolved.

(2) The source code shall be maintained at the parties' counsel's offices only on secured computers in a secured room without Internet access or network access to other computers, and the Receiving Party shall not copy, remove, or otherwise transfer any portion of the source code onto any recordable media or recordable device.

(3) The Receiving Party shall maintain a record of any individual who has inspected any portion of the source code in electronic or paper form. The Receiving Party shall maintain all paper copies of any printed portions of the source code in a secured, locked area. The Receiving Party shall not create any electronic or other images of the paper copies and shall not convert any of the information contained in the paper copies into any electronic format. The Receiving Party shall only make additional paper copies if such additional copies are (1) necessary to prepare court filings, pleadings, or other papers (including a testifying expert's expert report), (2) necessary for deposition, or (3) otherwise necessary for the preparation of its case. Any paper copies used during a deposition shall be retrieved by the Producing Party at the end of each day and must not be given to or left with a court reporter or any other individual. Any paper copies of source code shall be immediately marked "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE" pursuant to Paragraph 2.10 of the Protective Order (D.I. 94).

(4) Upon request of the deposing party, a computer with the source code of the party being deposed will be made available during deposition with a connected printer to allow for any additional source coded needed during the deposition to be printed out. Any source code that is printed out in this manner that the Receiving Party wishes to keep after the deposition shall be subject to the provisions of Paragraph (3) above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

FABIO E. MARINO

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants

BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC.

AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC

HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL LLP

ANN H. LIROFF

Attorneys for Defendant

DAVID CHEUNG

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,

GARRETT & DUNNER LLP

SCOTT R. MOSKO

Attorneys for Defendants

A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN, RAJKUMAR

JALAN, RON SZETO, AND STEVE HWANG

LOSCH & EHRLICH

JOSEPH EHRLICH

Attorneys for Defendant

LIANG HAN

Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, §X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory.

Respectfully submitted,

FABIO E. MARINO

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brocade Commc'n Sys. Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 29, 2011
Case No. 10-cv-03428 LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Brocade Commc'n Sys. Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Citations

Case No. 10-cv-03428 LHK (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)