From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broadway v. Lean On 8, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Sep 23, 2021
No. 03-21-00265-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 23, 2021)

Opinion

03-21-00265-CV

09-23-2021

Kianna Broadway, Appellant v. Lean On 8, Inc. d/b/a Chick-fil-A of Kyle, Appellee


FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. 20-2036, THE HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justice Triana, and Justice Kelly

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Appellant Kianna Broadway filed a notice of appeal from the trial court's March 11, 2021 "Order Granting Lean On 8, Inc. d/b/a Chick-fil-A's Motion for Summary Judgment." Upon initial review, the Clerk of this Court sent Broadway a letter informing her that this Court appears to lack jurisdiction over the appeal because our jurisdiction is limited to appeals in which there exists a final or appealable judgment or order. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.012; Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001) (explaining that appeal generally may only be taken from final judgment that disposes of all pending parties and claims in record unless statute provides for interlocutory appeal). In this case, the trial court's order only disposes of Broadway's claims against one defendant, and an order granting summary judgment in favor of only one of multiple defendants is not an appealable interlocutory order. Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352-53 (Tex. 1998) ("Appellate courts have jurisdiction to consider immediate appeals of interlocutory orders only if a statute explicitly provides appellate jurisdiction."); see also Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014 (specifically permitting appeal of various interlocutory orders but not permitting appeal from grant of partial summary judgment). The Clerk requested a response on or before September 13, 2021, informing this Court of any basis that exists for jurisdiction. Broadway filed a response, stating that after review of the trial court's order, she concedes that it did not dispose of all the parties in the case, is interlocutory, and is not a final, appealable order.

Accordingly, for the reasons explained above, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction


Summaries of

Broadway v. Lean On 8, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Sep 23, 2021
No. 03-21-00265-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Broadway v. Lean On 8, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Kianna Broadway, Appellant v. Lean On 8, Inc. d/b/a Chick-fil-A of Kyle…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Sep 23, 2021

Citations

No. 03-21-00265-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 23, 2021)

Citing Cases

Broadway v. Lean on 8, Inc.

We dismissed that appeal for want of jurisdiction because the summary-judgment order did not dispose of all…