From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broadnax v. Morgan

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Sep 14, 2011
Case No. 3:11cv347/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11cv347/LAC/EMT.

September 14, 2011


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 9, 2011 (doc. 8). Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice on the ground that the abstention doctrine set forth in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S. Ct. 746, 27 L. Ed. 2d 669 (1971) applies.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Broadnax v. Morgan

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Sep 14, 2011
Case No. 3:11cv347/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Broadnax v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS TYRONE BROADNAX, Petitioner, v. SHERIFF DAVID MORGAN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Sep 14, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:11cv347/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 14, 2011)