From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broadnax v. Hallet

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 24, 2022
21-cv-2926 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-2926 (VSB)

05-24-2022

CLEVELAND BROADNAX, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN MICHELLE HALLET, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff filed the complaint in this action on April 5, 2021. (Doc. 2.) On October 1, 2021, the New York City Department of Correction filed a waiver of service of summons unexecuted for Defendants Hallet, Sanchez, Grant, Vincent, Sans, and Lubin. (Doc. 14.) The Department of Correction identified that Defendant Hallet was no longer an employee of the agency, there was no Deputy Sanchez at Anna M. Kross Center, there were no matches to Defendant Sans, and there was more than one Officer Grant, Vincent, and Lubin at Anna M. Kross Center. (Id.) On March 17, 2022, former Warden Hallet and the remaining defendants in this action filed an answer to the complaint. (Doc. 29.) To date, Defendants Sanchez, Grant, Vincent, Sans, and Lubin have not answered. On April 4, 2022, and again on May 9, 2022, I ordered Plaintiff to indicate whether he intended to dismiss those Defendants from the action or whether he required additional assistance to identify and locate those Defendants. (Doc. 31.) On May 23, 2022, Plaintiff filed a letter stating that he intends to continue the litigation against those Defendants and requested assistance identifying those Defendants. (Doc. 32.) Plaintiff offered additional information in his letter to identify and locate the Defendants who have not yet responded to the complaint. (Id.)

Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the complaint and in his recent letter, (Doc. 32), Plaintiff supplies sufficient information to permit the City of New York and Correctional Health Services to identify Defendants Sanchez, Grant, Vincent, Sans, and Lubin. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the City of New York and Correctional Health Services must ascertain the identity of Defendants Sanchez, Grant, Vincent, Sans, and Lubin and the addresses where these Defendants may be served. The City of New York and Correctional Health Services must provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within sixty days of the date of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thirty days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint fully naming those Defendants, if not already named. The amended complaint will replace, not supplement, the original complaint. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to pro se Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Broadnax v. Hallet

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 24, 2022
21-cv-2926 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Broadnax v. Hallet

Case Details

Full title:CLEVELAND BROADNAX, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN MICHELLE HALLET, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 24, 2022

Citations

21-cv-2926 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 24, 2022)