Petitioner has not pursued the argument that the trial judge abused his discretion in denying the motion for a mistrial in this application, apparently because the United Stats Supreme Court has held that the right to testify may "bow to accommodate other legitimate interests in the criminal trial process" so long as any restrictions are not "arbitrary or disproportionate to the purposes they are designed to serve." Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44, 55-56 (1987); see also Broadhurst v. West, 2006 WL 89946, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ("The interest in orderly procedure is certainly a legitimate interest."); U.S. v. Jones, 880 F.2d 55, 59 (8th Cir. 1989); U.S. v. Byrd, 403 F.3d 1278, 1288 (11th Cir. 2005).