From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broadhead v. Woodard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Sep 26, 2012
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-341-MEF (M.D. Ala. Sep. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-341-MEF

09-26-2012

JAMES M. BROADHEAD, #224802, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER G. WOODARD et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On August 28, 2012 the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. 24). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and that this case is dismissed without prejudice for Broadhead's failure to file an amendment to his complaint in accordance with the directives of an order entered in this case.

Mark E. Fuller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Broadhead v. Woodard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Sep 26, 2012
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-341-MEF (M.D. Ala. Sep. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Broadhead v. Woodard

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. BROADHEAD, #224802, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER G. WOODARD et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 26, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-341-MEF (M.D. Ala. Sep. 26, 2012)

Citing Cases

Broadhead v. Smith

]" Broadhead v. Dozier, et al., Case No. 2:11-CV-489-MEF-TFM (M.D. Ala. 2012), Doc. 1 at 4. In this previous…

Broadhead v. Smith

aised strikingly similar claims for relief, i.e., that he was struck with security sticks by correctional…