From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broaddus v. Vanadium Corporation of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 26, 1963
19 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

November 26, 1963


Order, entered on August 24, 1962, denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Plaintiff is not the grantee of the defendant and privity of contract does not otherwise appear. The action therefore is local and may not be brought in a State other than that in which the land is located, to wit, Ohio. ( Johnson v. Dunbar, 114 N.Y.S.2d 845, affd. 282 App. Div. 720, affd. 306 N.Y. 697; Keyes Marshall Bros. Realty Co. v. Trustees of Canton Christian Coll., 146 App. Div. 796, affd. 205 N.Y. 593; Morris v. Hay, 172 App. Div. 145.) Moreover, section 536 Real Prop. of the Real Property Law (now Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, § 121), permitting an action to recover damages for injuries to out-of-State real property, requires possession by the injured party at the time the damages are sustained. ( Stark v. Howe Sound Co., 148 Misc. 686, 691, affd. 241 App. Div. 637.)

Concur — Rabin, J.P., McNally, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.


Summaries of

Broaddus v. Vanadium Corporation of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 26, 1963
19 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Broaddus v. Vanadium Corporation of America

Case Details

Full title:C. GRADY BROADDUS, Respondent, v. VANADIUM CORPORATION OF AMERICA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Deutsch v. Twersky

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court properly, inter alia, granted the defendant's…