From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broaddus v. Theurer

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Dec 17, 1926
111 So. 110 (Fla. 1926)

Opinion

Decision Filed December 17, 1926.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; L. L. Parks, Judge.

Knight, Thompson Turner and W. B. Dickenson, for Appellant.

Taliaferro Morris, for Appellee.


In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the decree entered by the trial court from which the appeal is taken should be reversed, while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice STRUM and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the opinion that said decree should be affirmed; and, there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the decree should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51; Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452; Quigg, Chief of Police, v. Radel, 86 Fla. 197, 97 South. Rep. 380, and State ex rel. Amos, v. Hamwey, 87 Fla. 55, 100 South. Rep. 796; Yarnell v. Gregory, 88 Fla. 91.

An order will be entered affirming the decree herein.

All concur.


Summaries of

Broaddus v. Theurer

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Dec 17, 1926
111 So. 110 (Fla. 1926)
Case details for

Broaddus v. Theurer

Case Details

Full title:J. W. BROADDUS, Appellant, v. PAUL THEURER, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Dec 17, 1926

Citations

111 So. 110 (Fla. 1926)
111 So. 110

Citing Cases

National City Bank v. Beulah Baptist Institutional Church

PER CURIAM. — In this case Mr. Chief Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the…

Johns and Ellzey v. Wilkerson

PER CURIAM. — In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion…