Defendant claims that the amended complaint failed to inform it of the nature of the claim as required by GCR 1963, 111.1. The trial court found that the pleadings were sufficient to apprise a normal, reasonable person of the claim against him. "Defendants served with process must appear or suffer the consequences." Kunsky-Trendle Broadcasting Corp. v. Kent Circuit Judge (1937), 281 Mich. 367, 370. Defendant further claims that the trial court made unwarranted assumptions from the testimony given. An examination of the record does not disclose any irregularities before trial nor any findings of the trial court which would indicate that the trial judge abused his discretion in failing to set aside the default.