From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broad. Music v. Baley

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 27, 2022
3:22-cv-00157-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Apr. 27, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00157-MMD-CSD

04-27-2022

BROADCAST MUSIC, INC.; HOUSE OF CASH, INC.; PEERMUSIC III LTD.; RIO BRAVO MUSIC, INC.; and RONDOR MUSIC INTERNATIONAL, INC., d/b/a IRVING MUSIC, Plaintiffs, v. CHERRIE BALEY, an individual d/b/a PONDEROSA SALOON, Defendant.

GUNDERSON LAW FIRM CATHERINE A. REICHENBERG, ESQ. NEVADA STATE BAR NO.: 10362 ATTORNEY FOR CHERRIE BAILEY, AN INDIVIDUAL D/B/A PONDEROSA SALOON ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP MICHELLE D. ALARIE, ESQ. ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP MICHELLE D. ALARIE, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., HOUSE OF CASH, INC., PEERMUSIC III LTD, RIO BRAVO MUSIC, INC., AND RONDOR MUSIC INTERNATIONAL, INC., DBA IRVING MUSIC


GUNDERSON LAW FIRM

CATHERINE A. REICHENBERG, ESQ.

NEVADA STATE BAR NO.: 10362

ATTORNEY FOR CHERRIE BAILEY, AN INDIVIDUAL D/B/A PONDEROSA SALOON

ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP

MICHELLE D. ALARIE, ESQ.

ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP

MICHELLE D. ALARIE, ESQ.

ATTORNEY FOR BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., HOUSE OF CASH, INC., PEERMUSIC III LTD, RIO BRAVO MUSIC, INC., AND RONDOR MUSIC INTERNATIONAL, INC., DBA IRVING MUSIC

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs BROADCAST MUSIC, INC.; HOUSE OF CASH, INC.; PEERMUSIC III LTD.; RIO BRAVO MUSIC, INC.; and RONDOR MUSIC INTERNATIONAL, INC., d/b/a IRVING MUSIC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their counsel Michelle D. Alarie, Esq., Armstrong Teasdale, LLP., and by Defendant CHERRIE BAILEY, an individual d/b/a PONDEROSA SALOON (“Defendants”), by and through her counsel, Catherine A. Reichenberg, Esq., Gunderson Law Firm, that the time allowed for Defendants to respond to the Plaintiffs' Complaint shall be extended up to 45 days, ending on and including June 17, 2022.

The Complaint and Summons were served April 12, 2022. This request for an extension oi time is made before the expiration of any deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by the Defendant.

Good cause exists for this extension as the parties are engaged in early settlement discussions in an effort to resolve the matter short of further litigation. Accordingly, counsel for all parties agree to extend the time for the Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint through June 17, 2022.

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is approved; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall have up to and including June 17, 2022

I to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint;

IT IS ORDERED.


Summaries of

Broad. Music v. Baley

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 27, 2022
3:22-cv-00157-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Apr. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Broad. Music v. Baley

Case Details

Full title:BROADCAST MUSIC, INC.; HOUSE OF CASH, INC.; PEERMUSIC III LTD.; RIO BRAVO…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 27, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00157-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Apr. 27, 2022)