From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Britton v. Templin

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 11, 2023
22-cv-03468-JSC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-03468-JSC

01-11-2023

DONALD BRITTON, Plaintiff, v. MARK TEMPLIN, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO SERVE SUMMONS & COMPLAINT RE: DKT. NO. 18

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States District Judge.

On September 13, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to serve the summons and complaint on Defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e) and file a certificate of service on or before October 14, 2022. (Dkt. No. 17.) Plaintiff did not do so. On December 6, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed under Rule 4(m), in writing by January 3, 2023. (Dkt. No. 18.) The Court also warned Plaintiff that failure to show cause could lead to his case being dismissed under Rule 4(m).

To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response, filed a certificate of service, or otherwise communicated with the Court. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice under Rule 4(m). See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) (“If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court-on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff-must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.”). The Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Britton v. Templin

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 11, 2023
22-cv-03468-JSC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Britton v. Templin

Case Details

Full title:DONALD BRITTON, Plaintiff, v. MARK TEMPLIN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 11, 2023

Citations

22-cv-03468-JSC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)