From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brittingham v. Anhorn

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 16, 2004
Civil Action No. 03-3945 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 16, 2004)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 03-3945.

August 16, 2004


ORDER


And now this 16th day of August, 2004, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff Bobby Lee Brittingham's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Document 26) is DENIED, Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant Anhorn's Answer (Document 31) is DENIED, and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant Beaty's Answer (Document 34) is Denied. Defendant Anhorn's and Defendant Beaty's Motions for Summary Judgment (Documents 27 and 30) are hereby taken under advisement for a subsequent Memorandum and Order.


Summaries of

Brittingham v. Anhorn

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 16, 2004
Civil Action No. 03-3945 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 16, 2004)
Case details for

Brittingham v. Anhorn

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY LEE BRITTINGHAM v. GUY ANHORN and T. MICHAEL BEATY, Individually and…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 16, 2004

Citations

Civil Action No. 03-3945 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 16, 2004)