From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Britt v. McAllen N. Imaging

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
May 12, 2022
No. 13-22-00019-CV (Tex. App. May. 12, 2022)

Opinion

13-22-00019-CV

05-12-2022

EDGAR L. BRITT, Appellant, v. MCALLEN NORTH IMAGING, Appellee.


On appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NORA L. LONGORIA Justice.

This matter is before the Court on its own motion. On January 20, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that his notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5(e) and 25.1(d) and was provided thirty days to correct the defects. On March 2, 2022, the Clerk of the Court again notified appellant of the defects and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant cured the defects, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b), (c). Additionally, on March 2, 2022, appellant was notified his docketing statement was past due. Appellant has failed to cure the defects in his notice of appeal, failed to file a docketing statement, and has not otherwise responded to the clerk's notices.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).


Summaries of

Britt v. McAllen N. Imaging

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
May 12, 2022
No. 13-22-00019-CV (Tex. App. May. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Britt v. McAllen N. Imaging

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR L. BRITT, Appellant, v. MCALLEN NORTH IMAGING, Appellee.

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg

Date published: May 12, 2022

Citations

No. 13-22-00019-CV (Tex. App. May. 12, 2022)