From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Britt v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 11, 2008
54 A.D.3d 1087 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 504241.

September 11, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

William Britt, Albion, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Rose, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ.


During the investigation of a cube fire, confidential information was disclosed implicating petitioner and another inmate as the individuals who directed a third inmate to set the fire which resulted in minor injuries to another inmate. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting an inmate, damaging state property and conspiring to start a fire. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the charges. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, the testimony of its author and the confidential information considered by the Hearing Officer in camera provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Berry v Goord, 13 AD3d 947; Matter of Rodriguez v Herbert, 270 AD2d 889, 890). Contrary to petitioner's claim, the Hearing Officer adequately ascertained the confidential informant's reliability by conducting an independent examination in camera ( see Matter of Berry v Goord, 13 AD3d at 947). Petitioner's denial of wrongdoing presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Fontaine v Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility, 35 AD3d 1113, 1114, lv dismissed 8 NY3d 943). Inasmuch as petitioner's claim of hearing officer bias was not raised in his administrative appeal, it has not been preserved for our review ( see Matter of Holmes v Brown, 43 AD3d 1234, 1235, lv denied 9 NY3d 815; Matter of Newsome v Selsky, 26 AD3d 565, 566).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Britt v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 11, 2008
54 A.D.3d 1087 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Britt v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM BRITT, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 11, 2008

Citations

54 A.D.3d 1087 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 6771
864 N.Y.S.2d 571

Citing Cases

Lightner v. Venettozzi

That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.…

Lightner v. Venettozzi

That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.…