Opinion
21142-21
09-21-2021
Kelly L. Britt Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent
ORDER
Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge.
Petitioner filed the petition in this case on June 9, 2021, seeking review of a notice of deficiency, dated April 26, 2021, issued to petitioner for tax year 2018. On June 29, 2021, petitioner filed a Letter dated June 28, 2021. However, further review indicates that petitioner's Letter appears to be more akin to a Motion To Dismiss.
In a deficiency case where the Court has jurisdiction, Internal Revenue Code section 7459(d) generally requires the Court to enter a decision as to the amount of the deficiency, if any. Settles v. Commissioner, 138 T.C. 372, 374 (2012). Because this case is based on a notice of deficiency, the Court is required to enter a decision and, accordingly, the petition in this case may not be withdrawn with or without prejudice.
Upon due consideration, it is
ORDERED that petitioner's Letter dated June 28, 2021, filed June 29, 2021, is recharacterized as petitioner's Motion To Dismiss. It is further
ORDERED that petitioner's Motion To Dismiss is denied. It is further
ORDERED that, on or before October 12, 2021, the parties shall either (1) submit stipulated decision documents so this case may be concluded, or (2) file status reports (preferably a joint report) with the Court concerning the then-present status of this case.
The Court encourages all litigants to register for electronic access (eAccess) so that they may electronically file and view documents in their Tax Court cases. If you currently file in paper and/or receive paper service from the Court, you are encouraged to register for eAccess by emailing dawson.support@ustaxcourt.gov.
1