From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bristow v. Sanchez

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 21, 2022
2:22-cv-01092-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Dec. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01092-APG-EJY

12-21-2022

JAMES BRISTOW and LATEEFA STARKS, Plaintiffs, v. YUDEL OMAR SANCHEZ; LVMPD OFFICER D. SUTTON P#15153; LVMPD DETECTIVE C. REICH P#9357; CLARK COUNTY; KRISTINA WILDEVELD, ESQ.; KENNETH FRIZZELL, III, ESQ.; HON. JUSTICE OF THE PEACE DIANA L. SULLIVAN; GREGORY DENUE, JUDGE PRO TEM, Defendants.


ORDER

ANDREW P. GORDON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants Kenneth Frizzell, III and Leo Flangas have each filed a “notice of improper service of summons and complaint.” ECF Nos. 39, 40. If these defendants seek to dismiss the complaint for failure to properly serve, they should file the appropriate motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b).


Summaries of

Bristow v. Sanchez

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 21, 2022
2:22-cv-01092-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Dec. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Bristow v. Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BRISTOW and LATEEFA STARKS, Plaintiffs, v. YUDEL OMAR SANCHEZ; LVMPD…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 21, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01092-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Dec. 21, 2022)