From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bristor v. Flaherty

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Dec 1, 1899
30 Misc. 111 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)

Opinion

December, 1899.

Maxwell C. Katz, for appellant.

George R. Bristor, for respondent.


The defendant now objects, among other things, that the record is silent as to his residence within the jurisdiction of the trial court, and this is true. For this reason the judgment must be reversed. Frees v. Ford, 6 N.Y. 176; Gilbert v. York, 111 id. 544.

FREEDMAN, P.J., and LEVENTRITT, J., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

Bristor v. Flaherty

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Dec 1, 1899
30 Misc. 111 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)
Case details for

Bristor v. Flaherty

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE R. BRISTOR, Respondent, v . WILLIAM H. FLAHERTY, Impleaded, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Dec 1, 1899

Citations

30 Misc. 111 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)
61 N.Y.S. 817

Citing Cases

Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Cromey

It was held that the Municipal Court had no jurisdiction over foreign corporations ( Rieser v. Parker Co., 27…

Hill v. Moebus

Judgment reversed, without costs, and new trial ordered in the Municipal Court in the district in which the…