From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brisk v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 17, 2021
1:21-cv-0430 JLT (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-0430 JLT

12-17-2021

CARL BRISK, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

(DOC. 15)

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff filed a stipulation of the parties for an extension of 65 days to file a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 15.) Dolly Trompeter, Plaintiff's counsel, reports the extension is necessary “[d]ue to the increase in certified administrative records being filed by defendant” and “a larger than usual number of briefs due for the month of December 2021 and January 2022.” (Id. at 2.) This is the first request for an extension, and it does not appear either party will suffer prejudice from the delay. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:

1. The request for an extension of time (Doc. 15) is GRANTED; and

2. Plaintiff SHALL file a motion for summary judgment no later than March 7, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brisk v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 17, 2021
1:21-cv-0430 JLT (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Brisk v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:CARL BRISK, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 17, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-0430 JLT (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2021)