From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Briseno v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Sep 17, 2020
NUMBER 13-20-00217-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 17, 2020)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-20-00218-CR

09-17-2020

CATARINO BRISENO JR, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


On appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes

Counsel for appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Appellant signed both the motion and an affidavit. We find the motion and affidavit together meet the requirement of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) that appellant and attorney must sign a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we GRANT the motion to dismiss and DISMISS the appeal.

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

GREGORY T. PERKES

Justice Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 17th day of September, 2020.


Summaries of

Briseno v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Sep 17, 2020
NUMBER 13-20-00217-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 17, 2020)
Case details for

Briseno v. State

Case Details

Full title:CATARINO BRISENO JR, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Sep 17, 2020

Citations

NUMBER 13-20-00217-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 17, 2020)