From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 8, 1978
364 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

No. 77-1296.

November 8, 1978.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Indian River County, Royce R. Lewis, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Charles D. Peters, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Glenn H. Mitchell, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Defendant appeals asserting error regarding the State's closing argument. In closing the prosecutor commented on defendant's failure to call certain witnesses. The trial court correctly overruled an objection to this argument. The prosecutor's comment about the absence of witnesses who had obvious knowledge of the defense asserted by defendant was not improper. See, Buckrem v. State, 355 So.2d 111 (Fla. 1978); Allen v. State, 320 So.2d 828 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), and Jenkins v. State, 317 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

The judgment is, however, subject to attack because it provides for a sentence at hard labor. McDonald v. State, 321 So.2d 453 (Fla.4th DCA 1975). The judgment is modified by deletion of the reference to hard labor and is hereby affirmed as modified.

AFFIRMED as MODIFIED.

DOWNEY, C.J., and CROSS and BERANEK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 8, 1978
364 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Brinson v. State

Case Details

Full title:IVORY CHARLES BRINSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 8, 1978

Citations

364 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)