From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brinson v. Mims & Thomas Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
May 4, 1966
186 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 35008.

May 4, 1966.

Writ of certiorari to Florida Industrial Commission.

Joseph Rosenkrantz, Theodore M. Trushin, Miami Beach and F. Perry Odom of Ervin, Pennington, Varn Jacobs, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Rose Marlow, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date November 17, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney's fees is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brinson v. Mims & Thomas Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
May 4, 1966
186 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Brinson v. Mims & Thomas Manufacturing Co.

Case Details

Full title:SHELLEY BRINSON, PETITIONER, v. MIMS THOMAS MANUFACTURING CO., EMPLOYER…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 4, 1966

Citations

186 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 1966)