Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-1657-AP
09-14-2012
MILLIE JEANNE BRINSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
Pro se Plaintiff : Millie J. Brinson For Defendant : JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney J. BENEDICT GARCÍA Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado DAVID BLOWER Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
Pro se Plaintiff:
Millie J. Brinson
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT GARCÍA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
DAVID BLOWER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: June 25, 2012
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: June 27, 2012
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: August 27, 2012
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate. However, the Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement the record if necessary at the time of the Opening Brief.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The Plaintiff anticipates submitting up-to-date medical records as supporting evidence to the claim. Defendant does not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
There are no other matters anticipated.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Parties agree to the following proposed briefing schedule:
A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: October 29, 2012
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: November 28, 2012
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: December 13, 2012
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff requests oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.
BY THE COURT:
John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
____________
Millie J. Brinson
401 Butch Cassidy Drive, Apt. A
Pro se Plaintiff
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
J. BENEDICT GARCÍA
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
By:
____________
DAVID BLOWER
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration