Brinkman v. Vanguard-Ems

Full title: EDWARD BRINKMAN, Plaintiff, v. VANGUARD-EMS, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Nov 5, 2010

10-CV-481-ST (D. Or. Nov. 5, 2010)

Opinion

10-CV-481-ST.

November 5, 2010

EDWARD BRINKMAN, Milwaukie, OR, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

HEIDEE STOLLER, STACEY E. MARK, Ater Wynne, LLP, Portland, OR, Attorneys for Defendant.

ORDER

ANNA BROWN, District JudgePage 2

Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#13) on August 26, 2010, in which she recommends this Court grant Defendant Vanguard-EMS's Motion (#5) to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice.

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9^th Cir. 1983) (rev'd on other grounds). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8^th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#13). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion (#5) to Dismiss and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 4th day of November, 2010.