From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brinkerhoff v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 4, 1983
97 A.D.2d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

November 4, 1983

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Ricotta, J.

Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Callahan, Boomer, Green and Schnepp, JJ. (Order entered Oct. 18, 1983.)


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The cover sheet of petitioner's nominating petition contains all the information prescribed by subdivision 2 of section 6-134 Elec. of the Election Law. Since the information which respondent claims was improperly omitted is not statutorily required, the motion to validate was properly granted (see Election Law, § 6-138, subd 2; cf. Matter of Engert v McNab, 60 N.Y.2d 607).


Summaries of

Brinkerhoff v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 4, 1983
97 A.D.2d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Brinkerhoff v. Mahoney

Case Details

Full title:KAREN M. BRINKERHOFF, Respondent, v. EDWARD J. MAHONEY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1983

Citations

97 A.D.2d 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)