From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brinker v. W.P. McDevitt Assoc

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 21, 1997
693 So. 2d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Summary

reversing dismissal of fraud in the inducement claims where the plaintiff alleged that two individual defendants fraudulently induced him to enter into an employment contract with their insurance agency for the purpose of bringing his "book of business" into the agency and that defendants never intended to let him retain ownership of the "book" or pay him its value if his employment should be terminated

Summary of this case from First Financial USA, Inc. v. Steinger

Opinion

No. 95-3933.

May 21, 1997.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Judge. No. CL 94-8545 AE.

Gary D. Weiner, Deerfield Beach, for Appellant.

Robert R. Morris of Robert R. Morris, P.A., Royal Palm Beach, for Appellees.


Although we affirm the dismissal of plaintiff's breach of contract claims with prejudice, we reverse the dismissal of his fraud in the inducement claims against both defendants.

His second amended complaint sufficiently alleged that both defendants fraudulently induced him to enter into an employment contract with their insurance agency for the purpose of bringing his "book of business" into the agency and that they never intended to let him retain ownership of the "book" or pay him its value if his employment should be terminated. See Lou Bachrodt Chevrolet Inc. v. Savage, 570 So.2d 306 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), rev. denied, 581 So.2d 165 (Fla. 1991) (elements of fraud in inducement: representation of material fact that is knowingly false and intentionally made to induce the representee to do an act from which he suffers damage); Alexander/Davis Properties Inc. v. Graham, 397 So.2d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (although fraud may not be predicated on mere promise not performed, fraud in the inducement may properly be founded on fact that promisor had specific intent when promise was made not to perform promise, and other elements of fraud are established); and Roth v. Nautical Engineering Corp., 654 So.2d 978 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (corporate officer individually liable for fraud committed while acting as corporate representative.).

STEVENSON, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Brinker v. W.P. McDevitt Assoc

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 21, 1997
693 So. 2d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

reversing dismissal of fraud in the inducement claims where the plaintiff alleged that two individual defendants fraudulently induced him to enter into an employment contract with their insurance agency for the purpose of bringing his "book of business" into the agency and that defendants never intended to let him retain ownership of the "book" or pay him its value if his employment should be terminated

Summary of this case from First Financial USA, Inc. v. Steinger
Case details for

Brinker v. W.P. McDevitt Assoc

Case Details

Full title:Edwin BRINKER, Appellant, v. W.P. McDEVITT ASSOCIATES, INC., and William…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 21, 1997

Citations

693 So. 2d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Pavletic v. Bertram Yacht, Inc.

Moreover, the Amended Complaint fails to allege that Defendant knew the representations it made were false,…

First Financial USA, Inc. v. Steinger

We ruled that "[a] corporate officer may be individually liable for torts committed even while acting as the…