From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brink v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 12, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-2350 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-2350

08-12-2020

LUCILLE M. BRINK, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2020, upon consideration of "Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act" (Doc. 20), "Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Application for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act" (Doc. 21), "Plaintiff's EAJA Reply Brief" (Doc. 22), and "Defendants Surreply to Plaintiff's EAJA Reply Brief" (Doc. 23), it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/S LINDA K. CARACAPPA

LINDA K. CARACAPPA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Brink v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 12, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-2350 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 2020)
Case details for

Brink v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:LUCILLE M. BRINK, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 12, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-2350 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 2020)