From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brindley v. GEICO Advantage Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 7, 2023
2:23-cv-00793-BJR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 7, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00793-BJR

07-07-2023

RALPH J. BRINDLEY and KATHARINE BRINDLEY, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company, a foreign corporation; GEICO Choice Insurance Company, a foreign corporation; GEICO Secure Insurance Company, a foreign corporation; Government Employees Insurance Company, a foreign corporation; GEICO General Insurance Company, a foreign corporation; GEICO Indemnity Company, a foreign corporation; GEICO Casualty Company, a foreign corporation; ARPHAXAD PATRICE CARROLL, Jr. and “Jane Doe” Carroll, and the marital community composed thereof; and John and Jane Does nos. 1 through 10, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY NONSUIT

HONORABLE BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER has come before the Court following Plaintiffs' Motion for Voluntary Nonsuit pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2). The Court having reviewed the motion and considered the following:

1. Plaintiffs' Motion for Voluntary Nonsuit Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2);

2. Any pleadings filed in opposition.

3. Relevant legal authorities.

Having reviewed the above-referenced materials, it is hereby ORDERED, that Plaintiffs' Motion for Voluntary Nonsuit Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) is GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) and without an award of fees and costs.


Summaries of

Brindley v. GEICO Advantage Ins. Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 7, 2023
2:23-cv-00793-BJR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Brindley v. GEICO Advantage Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:RALPH J. BRINDLEY and KATHARINE BRINDLEY, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 7, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00793-BJR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 7, 2023)