From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brimson v. Brimson

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 20, 1958
309 S.W.2d 29 (Ark. 1958)

Summary

holding Court lacked jurisdiction after mandate was filed in the Trial Court to consider motion for clarification of the judgment

Summary of this case from Jones v. Jones

Opinion

No. 5-1280

Opinion delivered January 20, 1958.

APPEAL ERROR — JURISDICTION OF APPELLATE COURT AFTER FILING OF MANDATE IN LOWER COURT. — After a mandate in an opinion is filed in the trial court, the Supreme Court loses jurisdiction even to clarify its opinion.

Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court, First Division; Sam Rorex, Chancellor; motion for clarification of judgment denied.


The motion for clarification of the judgment is denied. The opinion in this case was delivered June 24, 1957, and petition for rehearing was denied September 30, 1957. See Brimson v. Brimson, 227 Ark. 1045, 304 S.W.2d 935.

We issued our mandate on October 2, 1957, and it was filed in the trial court. There, some question arose as to our opinion; and, the appellee then filed in the Supreme Court the present "motion to clarify judgment." When the mandate was filed in the trial court the Supreme Court lost jurisdiction. American Co. v. Wheeler, 183 Ark. 550, 36 S.W.2d 965.


Summaries of

Brimson v. Brimson

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jan 20, 1958
309 S.W.2d 29 (Ark. 1958)

holding Court lacked jurisdiction after mandate was filed in the Trial Court to consider motion for clarification of the judgment

Summary of this case from Jones v. Jones
Case details for

Brimson v. Brimson

Case Details

Full title:BRIMSON v. BRIMSON

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 20, 1958

Citations

309 S.W.2d 29 (Ark. 1958)
228 Ark. 562

Citing Cases

Oliver v. Ark. Prof. B.B

Oliver argues that the circuit court in the administrative-appeals process is analogous to an appellate…

Jones v. Jones

As mentioned, Dr. Jones believes that this Court lost jurisdiction in this matter when the mandate was issued…