From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brilliant Instruments, Inc. v. GuideTech, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 14, 2011
No. C 09-5517 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 09-5517 CW Docket No. 189

11-14-2011

BRILLIANT INSTRUMENTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. GUIDETECH, INC., Defendant. AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS


ORDER REGARDING

MOTION OF

BRILLIANT

INSTRUMENTS, INC.

FOR LEAVE TO FILE

UNDER SEAL

EXHIBITS F, G AND

Q TO THE LATHRAM

DECLARATION

On November 1, 2011, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Brilliant Instruments, Inc. filed a motion pursuant to Local Rule 79-5 seeking authorization to file under seal Exhibits F, G and Q to the Declaration of Thomas W. Lathram, submitted in support of its Reply in Further Support of its Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Non-Taxable Costs. In support of its motion to seal, Movant offered a declaration that states that the exhibits have been designated as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential-Attorney's Eyes Only" by Defendant and Counter-Claimant GuideTech, LLC pursuant to the protective order in this case. Lathram Decl. ¶ 3.

Because the public interest favors filing all court documents in the public record, any party seeking to file a document under seal must demonstrate good cause to do so. Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass'n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010). This cannot be established simply by showing that the document is subject to a protective order or by stating in general terms that the material is considered to be confidential, but rather must be supported by a sworn declaration demonstrating with particularity the need to file each document under seal. See Civil L.R. 79-5(a). If a document has been designated as confidential by another party, that party must file a declaration establishing that the document is sealable within seven days after the motion to seal was filed. Civ. Local R. 79-5(d). If the designating party does not file its responsive declaration, the document or proposed filing will be made part of the public record. Id.

GuideTech, LLC, as the party designating the material as confidential, has not yet filed a responsive declaration in support of Brilliant Instruments, Inc.'s motion to seal. Within three days of this order, GuideTech, LLC shall file a declaration in support of the motion to seal. The declaration must state with particularity good cause to file each exhibit under seal in light of Local Rule 79-5 and applicable law.

If GuideTech, LLC fails to file its responsive declaration as required by this order, the exhibits will be made part of the public record.

In the future, all parties must follow Local Rule 79-5 and these procedures.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLAUDIA WILKEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brilliant Instruments, Inc. v. GuideTech, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 14, 2011
No. C 09-5517 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Brilliant Instruments, Inc. v. GuideTech, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRILLIANT INSTRUMENTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. GUIDETECH, INC., Defendant. AND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 14, 2011

Citations

No. C 09-5517 CW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)